It's interesting that Paul Graham doesn't say what evidence he used to measure popularity, in order to then rank each group (just 'everybody knew') - it sounds like people who are similar sat together, and that he decided that people who are disabled were bottom of the league and the butt of the joke. I hope the article really has aged b…
It's interesting that Paul Graham doesn't say what evidence he used to measure popularity, in order to then rank each group (just 'everybody knew') - it sounds like people who are similar sat together, and that he decided that people who are disabled were bottom of the league and the butt of the joke. I hope the article really has aged badly on that front, but it does smack of a certain toxic masculinity that now defines techbroism too.
It's interesting that Paul Graham doesn't say what evidence he used to measure popularity, in order to then rank each group (just 'everybody knew') - it sounds like people who are similar sat together, and that he decided that people who are disabled were bottom of the league and the butt of the joke. I hope the article really has aged badly on that front, but it does smack of a certain toxic masculinity that now defines techbroism too.