You did an excellent job in the debate for the amount of freedom you were given, great job navigating the conversation around the nonagenarian host. I've been subscribed to you for a little while without realising that you are the Bret Stephens bedbugs guy. You've just rocketed to the top of my faves.
Always love reading you Dave. The Twitter files were of no importance.?An Appeals Court disagrees with you having held in part for the Plaintiffs. But who cares about the 1st Amendment and governmental censorship? Not you, Dave. Or that the Russia collusion baloney has been shown to be nothing less than a collusive attempt by the Neo-Con Dems you so admire and the Intelligence Community led by John Brennan, an admitted liar who illegally spied on Congress.
And still you're amazed that a complete incompetent like Harris lost the election. after being appointed (anointed) by a Democratic Party in name only.
Yeah, always a pleasure to read a self-appointed Expert with a thin resume tell us how it is. I've no use for Trump, but admit it , Dave, you read all the tea leaves wrong and are still thinking all will be swell in '28. Best of luck buddy
. For goodness sakes , Dave admitted he lost his argument with Turley( a U of C grad, btw. Dave seems so caught up in his own credentials and all). when he admitted he refused to directly address Turley's thesis. That is known as losing the argument by concession. Y0our contempt is my stating the facts that none of you even try to address let alone refute. In the end the Dems are done till '32 and probably '36 unless the economy collapses, which is the state Biden left it in-on the verge of collapse. My so called "assorted contempt
" is only for those who ignore reality while hiding behind a failed ideology that they hope will protect them from being forced to join the proletariat. No new Mercedes or summer houses on Martha's Vineyard next to the fraud that is President Obama. I prefer contempt to cupidity.
Uh, Sean? I definitely didn't admit I lost the argument with Turley. Come on, man.
We were asked to debate the state of Twitter under Elon. Turley attempted instead to have a debate about Twitter's handling of the Hunter Biden story in 2020. I decided to address the question we were invited to debate.
"And his last Big Vision, the metaverse, turned out not to have legs.": I see what you did there.
Thanks for that. In these grim times, I'll take any humor I can get.
Would it surprise you to learn that ZeroHedge is _also_ a grift
You did an excellent job in the debate for the amount of freedom you were given, great job navigating the conversation around the nonagenarian host. I've been subscribed to you for a little while without realising that you are the Bret Stephens bedbugs guy. You've just rocketed to the top of my faves.
Always love reading you Dave. The Twitter files were of no importance.?An Appeals Court disagrees with you having held in part for the Plaintiffs. But who cares about the 1st Amendment and governmental censorship? Not you, Dave. Or that the Russia collusion baloney has been shown to be nothing less than a collusive attempt by the Neo-Con Dems you so admire and the Intelligence Community led by John Brennan, an admitted liar who illegally spied on Congress.
And still you're amazed that a complete incompetent like Harris lost the election. after being appointed (anointed) by a Democratic Party in name only.
Yeah, always a pleasure to read a self-appointed Expert with a thin resume tell us how it is. I've no use for Trump, but admit it , Dave, you read all the tea leaves wrong and are still thinking all will be swell in '28. Best of luck buddy
Sean, I’m not sure I believe that you always love reading Dave. Maybe “expressing assorted contempt” is your love language, though.
I appreciate facts not unsubstantiated opinions
. For goodness sakes , Dave admitted he lost his argument with Turley( a U of C grad, btw. Dave seems so caught up in his own credentials and all). when he admitted he refused to directly address Turley's thesis. That is known as losing the argument by concession. Y0our contempt is my stating the facts that none of you even try to address let alone refute. In the end the Dems are done till '32 and probably '36 unless the economy collapses, which is the state Biden left it in-on the verge of collapse. My so called "assorted contempt
" is only for those who ignore reality while hiding behind a failed ideology that they hope will protect them from being forced to join the proletariat. No new Mercedes or summer houses on Martha's Vineyard next to the fraud that is President Obama. I prefer contempt to cupidity.
Uh, Sean? I definitely didn't admit I lost the argument with Turley. Come on, man.
We were asked to debate the state of Twitter under Elon. Turley attempted instead to have a debate about Twitter's handling of the Hunter Biden story in 2020. I decided to address the question we were invited to debate.
Jeebus. You agreed to debate Turley? That deserves a medal, and a donation.