Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerben Wierda's avatar

Trump was lying, but he lied 'a deeper (& darker) truth' for the majority of voters. They want the world to be different, and Trump actually presents that different world, even if it's not factual. Those facts and all the crazy things he said were superficial (and not all that relevant) for his voters. They discerned an underlying 'truth' that was convincing.

"While probably no former time tolerated so many diverse opinions on religious or philosophical matters, factual truth, if it happens to oppose a given group’s profit or pleasure, is greeted today with greater hostility than ever before." Hannah Arendt (1967)

"Since the liar is free to fashion his “facts” to fit the profit and pleasure, or even the mere expectations, of his audience, the chances are that he will be more persuasive than the truthteller. Indeed, he will usually have plausibility on his side" Hannah Arendt (1967)

"That facts are not secure in the hands of power is obvious, but the point here is that power, by its very nature, can never produce a substitute for the secure stability of factual reality, which, because it is past, has grown into a dimension beyond our reach. Facts assent themselves by being stubborn, and their fragility is oddly combined with great resiliency – the same irreversibility that is the hallmark of all human action. In their stubbornness, facts are superior to power; they are less transitory than power formations, which arise when men get together for a purpose but disappear as soon as the purpose is either achieved or lost. This transitory character makes power a highly unreliable instrument for achieving permanence of any kind, and, therefore, not only truth and facts are insecure in its hands but untruth and non-facts as well." Hannah Arendt (1967)

Sadly, recognising facts too late may have dire consequences (think climate crisis).

The absence of Joe Biden from the political stage during his presidency will have been a major reason this has happened. For most of the last two years, effectively only Trump was talking to the voters, presenting his 'alternative facts'. The Fox ecosystem made many voters unreachable for the Democrats too. Harris did what she could, but she could not come back from that. And the Democrats are less believable protectors of 'ordinary people', having supported the full capitalist free market credos that have been so important in the development of the bad situations people experience, they are a fragmented and weak coalition.

What I expect first is an attack on the fact-driven press.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/we-need-protect-truth-much-more-than-free-speech-gerben-wierda-rewbe

Expand full comment
Geoff Anderson's avatar

Spot on. two points:

1) you meant "toe" not "tow" - yeah, I am pedantic.

2) your bullet: "The courts will provide no protection. Alito and Thomas will retire, to be replaced with younger ideological carbon copies of themselves. Conservative activist judges will have a 6-3 Supreme Court majority for at least the next couple decades. And the lower courts will be filled with Trump loyalists as well." needs to be extended. Justice Sototmayor is also likely to age out (retire or pass) so that would mean Trump gets 7 of 9 justices. That is what is horrifying.

Expand full comment
67 more comments...

No posts